Space shuttle ethics case study

shuttle disasters

As the shuttles prime contractor, Rockwell Internationals engineers had a large say in Challengers readiness. O-rings leave their ruts and seal themselves into place on lift off while hot gas leaks into the SRB. Unfortunately, there was major difficulty of communication between organizational lines, between Rockwells engineers at the base and their supervisors, who advised against the launch.

Space shuttle ethics case study

Rockwell engineers determined that proceeding with a launch was ill- advised, yet agreed with the NASA management on the base, in the end, to ensue the process. Rockwells responsibility is to NASA and to the astronauts. These problems are related to virtue ethics, consequentialism, and deontology. Engineers shall be guided in all their relations by the highest standards of honesty and integrity. But they were not villainous. Secondly, the solution to the problem must be ethical and moral by virtue and deontology. These seals were required to suppress hot gasses during lift- off that would leak into the SRBs. Where, the reputed British Petroleum team was lagging behind the time allowed for their project on the Gulf of Mexico and had to rush to finish their task on time. The solutions maximize happiness for astronauts and mission controllers as well as achieve the desired goals.

To solve this problem, Morton-Thiokol could have produced better O-rings that could be sustained at any temperature. Morton-Thiokol takes a major blow to its reputation in the rocket sciences and rubber industries; its future bidding prospects seem quite miniscule now.

Challenger case study in professional ethics

Arguably the most affected primary stakeholders however, are the astronauts and their families. You may have already concluded that the Challenger disaster was the result of only the decisions made during the evening prior to and the day of launch. Some months later, a commission appointed by the President to investigate the disaster declared that the cause was the failure of a seal in one of the solid rocket boosters. Their reputation as a contractor has been tarnished due to the shuttles disintegration. What resulted was a series of ethical issues, before and after the accident, which in some cases were handled properly, and in some cases, were not. The solutions maximize happiness for astronauts and mission controllers as well as achieve the desired goals. Astronauts and their families entrust their lives with the mission production and management personnel.

Many of these were identified in his report that contributed to other problems within the agency. To understand Feynman, and you should try. Rockwell engineers should have trusted their calculations and predictions in making decisions pertaining to the launch, particularly the temperature dangers.

Engineers may express publicly technical opinions that are founded upon knowledge of the facts and competence in the subject matter.

challenger crew

Witnessing an accidental loss in life is an unfair feeling. Case Studies.

challenger blowing up
Rated 6/10 based on 109 review
ME Engineering Ethics 3